I'm torn. I see both sides equally. I can completely understand why likes could in some way influence voting, but that's no different than being allowed to vote multiple times.
I'm pretty certain the multiple votes is intended to allow all stories to get some recognition, and it's worked really well so far, but at the same time, in my eyes this is no less of an issue tainting the voting system than likes do:
eg:
- People withholding votes which may prevent a story that resonated with an overall majority from winning because they want to push the one they personally think was better than the rest.
- Or on the reverse, a story that was good enough to earn the majorities second to fourth vote steamrolling to a massive victory despite nobody considering it to be their favourite.
The point is, how seriously do we really take the votes that likes should be removed for fear that they may sway it? Especially since everyone is voting by the rules they themselves believe to be the fairest way to do so rather than a set of criteria laid out in the competition.
Besides, when it comes to likes I tend to not drop them onto those that have lots and instead push them onto less liked articles that I personally thought were really well done. There are people who enter every week and have yet to pull in more than 2-3 votes who I've thoroughly enjoyed every single thing they've written and am glad they took the time to write it.