For clarification, I wasn't calling anyone a liar.
If the part about "someone making stuff up" was what triggered that, it was about this post:
it *ought* to be irrelevant, i agree. But I find that if there's a list of say, ten best fantasy books of 2016 and you ask the author of that list why it's ten male authors on the list, he'll say "I don't think about gender". Which is why we still need to talk about gender. 
Guy simply thrown it out there without even providing some respectable list for the claim.
Then 5 minutes later we return with the most popular list voted on the Internet and we find out it's actually 9:1 to female authors, on both Fantasy and YA Fantasy.
And now? The awesome results obtained from women were the product of readers simply voting on stuff they enjoyed? Or we apply the same logic and think that such vast majority is only because people thought about their gender?
I just felt it was very inappropriate to apply that line of thinking to both genders to "explain" their success or a majority in some list. Or that female authors may need extra help to obtain results instead of their own effort and work. And as the results showed, in GR and in other popular awards, that they clearly didn't need it.
Just that.